Tony, after reading your first post on this thread, I have a comment on "single shot issues."
Having hunted birds and small game a lot in the forested East, I finally decided that out there anything other than a single shot was basically just extra cost, extra weight, extra wasted ammo, and "keepin' up with the Joneses"! With ruffed grouse and woodcock, you usually only get one practical shot. I carried a double for many years and can't remember a single time when I missed with the first barrel and connected with the second.
Now, I'm NOT the world's best wingshot. But I think the problem--especially with ruffed grouse and woodcock-- is that what you get is ONE feasible shot, and often not even that. The second is usually just a "Hail Mary," or "sprayin' and prayin". Trims the woods a little but nothing else.
So why carry two barrels? I finally started carrying just my 20 guage 220SC (with the Savage Choke opened wide open) and left the doubles home for clays and hunting out-of-state for pheasants, huns, and quail, where the second shot is useful. My score on grouse and woodcock didn't change, and the only time I ever wished for a double was when I bumped a creek or beaver pond to see if there were any ducks in it. Since most such places are frozen solid most of the upland season, that was only a marginal sacrifice. And I sure liked the light weight of that 220 compared even to my double Beretta 20! And because it is hammerless and has a tang safety, you can switch freely between a 220 and a single trigger double without any confusion or transition.
My only regret about the 220 is that they don't make 'em any more! I think your "issues" are actually "virtues."
Mike Armstrong